MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392389948 · doi:10.4000/bahmuf.539

La chasse baleinière française, une industrie au cœur des échanges avec les Mondes américains des années 1780 aux années 1830

2024· article· fr· W4392389948 on OpenAlexaff
C Coicaud

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de l Association des historiens modernistes des universités françaises · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Bulletin of Medical History
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’une des conséquences indirectes et inattendues de la Guerre d’indépendance des États-Unis est la renaissance de l’industrie baleinière en France dans les années 1780. Soumise au strict protectionnisme anglais, la nouvelle nation états-unienne perd son principal débouché commercial pour ses huiles et ses fanons de cétacés. Un transfert massif de capitaux, de techniques et de pratiques vers Dunkerque, puis Le Havre, est alors orchestré par des armateurs et marins expérimentés de New Bedford et des Quakers de l’île de Nantucket. Incarnée par les trajectoires personnelles de la famille Rotch et de Jeremiah Winslow, premier armateur baleinier français du xixe siècle, la baleinerie française s’appuie sur des processus d'échanges humains et socio-économiques mais aussi de savoir-faire transatlantiques qui permettent l’essor de cette branche industrielle halieutique si spécifique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de l Association des historiens modernistes des universités françaisesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207