MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392394239 · doi:10.3988/jcn.2023.0284

Primary Familial Brain Calcification With <i>XPR1</i> Mutation Presenting With Cognitive Dysfunction

2024· article· en· W4392394239 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sojung Yoon, Seok Jong Chung, Yun Joong Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Neurology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorea Health Industry Development Institute
KeywordsCalcificationMedicineMutationCognitionGeneticsInternal medicineBiologyPsychiatryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Editor,Basal ganglia calcification is a common incidental finding in brain imaging, being reported in 20%-30% of the elderly. 1 More than 50 clinical diagnoses have been reported to be associated with calcium accumulation in the basal ganglia. 2 This condition was previously called familial idiopathic basal ganglia calcification, Fahr syndrome, Fahr's disease, and striopallidodentate calcinosis, but primary familial brain calcification (PFBC) was coined to imply that there is a genetic component.Seven Mendelian genes (SLC20A2, PDGFRB, PDGFB, XPR1, MYORG, JAM2, and CMPK2) for PFBC have been discovered.3 Here we report the first Korean case of PFBC caused by an XPR1 mutation, who presented with early-onset cognitive decline with apathy and mild parkinsonism.A 54-year-old female presented with a 3-year history of cognitive deficit.She complained of difficulty in pronouncing words, comprehending complex sentences, and mathematical calculations, which had progressed over the previous year.She exhibited apathy, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and nocturia.She has been taking medications for hypertension, type-2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia.There was no family history of any neurological disorders.A neurological examination revealed a moderate degree of dysarthria, mild symmetric bradykinesia, and rigidity in both upper extremities.Her gait and postural stability were intact.She has scores of 10, 17, and 15 on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III score, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MoCA), respectively.A comprehensive neuropsychological study using the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery revealed mild cognitive impairment involving multiple cognitive domains including memory, attention, language, and visuospatial function.Her score on the Korean version of the Short Form of the Geriatric Depression Scale (SGDS-K) was 9, suggesting mild depression.Her score on the Withdrawal/Apathy/Lack of Vigor (WAV) subscale was 3/3.Laboratory studies revealed normal levels of serum calcium, inorganic phosphorous, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, osteocalcin, and parathyroid hormone.Low-dose methimazole was started since a thyroid function test indicated subclinical hypothyroidism.Other routine blood test results were normal.Computed tomography (Fig. 1A-C) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Fig. 1E-H) revealed dense calcifications in both corona radiata, the basal ganglia (especially the globus pallidus), and the dentate nucleus of the cerebellum.18 F-FP-CIT [(3-[ 18 F]fluoropropyl)-2βcarbon ethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane] positron-emission tomography (PET) showed preserved dopamine transporter (DAT) binding (Fig. 1D).Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET showed diffusely decreased FDG uptake in the frontal and parietal lobes and the cerebellum, while showing relatively preserved uptake in the sensorimotor cortex and basal ganglia (Fig. 1I-L).Screening for mutations by whole-exome sequencing revealed the heterozygous missense mutation c.1871G>A (p.Arg624His, NM_004736.3) in XPR1 (OMIM 213600) (Supplementary Fig. 1 in the online-only Data Supplement).She was prescribed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical NeurologySame topicThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryFrench-language works237,207