Smart Controller Integrated with MQTT Broker Based on Machina Learning Techniques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Massive amounts of heterogeneous data are produced by Internet of Things (IoT) devices utilized in daily life and numerous fields, and these data streams need to be stored, processed, analyzed, and transmitted to the cloud.It usually suffers from missing values and anomalies; system services also suffer from congestion due to slow processors, resulting in low throughput, a high response time, slow decision-making, and data loss, resulting in low quality of service and the deterioration of the system's performance.In this study, propose to integrate the smart controller (SC) with the Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) broker and services in the fog node to make decisions automatically to prevent congestion in the system's services and speed up the processing.The IoT stream is inspected in the services for anomalies using one-class support vector machines (OCSVM).Then, using the integrating technique of principal component analysis (PCA) and the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm in the SC, obtain the best prediction of the efficient number of services that must be deployed in the system.The operating model proposed showed significantly stable system performance in terms of throughput, latency, response time, the amount of data loss, and preventing congestion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it