MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392409681 · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-edc.120

PA-206 Breaking the silence of female genital schistosomiasis in Ghana’s health system: a case of health workers within the FAST project

2023· article· en· W4392409681 on OpenAlexaff
Maxwell Ayindenaba Dalaba, Margaret Gyapong, Mustapha Immurana, Alfred Kwesi Manyeh, Kazeem Arogundade, Julie Jacobson, Alison Krentel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsBruyère
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchistosomiasisSilenceFemale circumcisionReproductive healthSex organMedicineEnvironmental healthGynecologyBiologyHelminthsPhysicsAcousticsImmunologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS) remains one of the most critical and neglected topics in Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) and the health of women and girls worldwide. Health workers’ knowledge of FGS is vital to the prevention and management of the disease. This study, therefore, conducted implementation research to identify and address the FGS knowledge gap among health workers in Ghana. Methods This study was a 3-year (2020 -2022) implementation research study applying a pragmatic uncontrolled quasi-experimental study design. The study involved a baseline assessment, an intervention phase involving the training of health workers about FGS and an endline assessment. A mixed-method approach was applied to data collection. The qualitative data involved 20 In-depth Interviews while the quantitative data involved 116 health workers. NVIVO 12 and STATA 14 were used for qualitative and quantitative data analysis, respectively. Results Before the intervention, there was little knowledge about FGS among health workers as most participants only understood FGS as merely urogenital schistosomiasis in females. Based on the baseline assessments, an FGS education intervention in the form of training of health workers and distribution of FGS educational materials was carried out. The impact of this intervention enhanced health workers’ awareness and management of FGS. However, access (availability and affordability) to praziquantel (the main drug used in treating and preventing schistosomiasis) was cited as a challenge. Conclusion The FGS intervention has improved health workers’ awareness and understanding of FGS. However, there is a need to improve access to praziquantel to facilitate FGS management. In addition, a holistic strategy encompassing all stakeholders at the individual, community, and health-system levels is required to improve the general knowledge and management of FGS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.010
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→