MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392412272 · doi:10.62310/liab.v3i1.114

Comparative analysis of canine genomes in terms of chromosomal perspectives

2023· article· en· W4392412272 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shilpa Tewari, Chandra Sekhar Mukhopadhyay

Bibliographic record

VenueLetters In Animal Biology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsGenomeEvolutionary biologyBiologyComputational biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most well-known pet and one of the first domesticated animals is the dog. There are around 400 different dog breeds worldwide. There are many different breeds, each with its unique set of features. The dog's euchromatic genome is predicted to be 2.31 to 2.47 billion base pairs in size, which is somewhat smaller than the human genome but comparable to the mouse genome. The mean value and standard error mean of chromosomal length of five exotic breeds are estimated in this study: Labrador, Basenji, Tasha-Boxer, Mischka German shepherd, and Zoey Great Dane. The total mean value of autosomes is 58266084.83 and the standard error mean is ± 1522688.95 for five exotic breeds of dogs. The corresponding mean values for the X and Y chromosomes were 121774056 and 3937623, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLetters In Animal BiologySame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207