MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392415251 · doi:10.55606/jurrafi.v2i1.763

PERANAN HARUN NASUTION DALAM PENGEMBANGAN ISLAM DI INDONESIA

2023· article· id· W4392415251 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Indah Khairani Hasibuan, Khairani Munadia, Muhammad Basri

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL RISET RUMPUN AGAMA DAN FILSAFAT · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and Radicalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamPolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Harun Nasution lahir pada 19 September 1919 di Pematang Siantar, Sumatera Utara dan meninggal pada 19 September 1998 di Jakarta. Semasa hidupnya, Harun mengikuti beberapa tingkat pengetahuan, maupun didalam ataupun di luar negeri, antara lain Hollandsh Indlandsche School (HIS)., pendidikan Belanda., Modern Islamic Kweek school (MIK), Padang, Sumatera Barat, juga belajar di Mekkah serta di Universitas Al-Azhar pada tahun 1939, selanjutnya di McGill Institute of Islamic Studies, Monteral, Kanada. Kedua, upaya Harun Nasution untuk mengembangkan Islam di Indonesia adalah: Cara fikir Islam membuat bermacam karya ilmiah berupa buku di bidang Pengetahuan Islam, sebagai dosen di beberapa perguruan tinggi di dalam dan luar negeri, beliau kadang pernah menjadi Direktur IAIN Syarif Hidayatullah pada tahun 1973. Ketiga, Pengaruh Pemikiran Islam dalam Sosio Islam - Organisasi Keagamaan di Indonesia oleh Harun Nasution. Dalam hal ini Nahdatul Ulama menemukan pengaruh pemikiran Harun Nasution dalam organisasi, walaupun di bidang pendidikan maupun dalam pemikiran Islam. Kata kunci: Pengembangan Islam Di Indonesia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL RISET RUMPUN AGAMA DAN FILSAFATSame topicIslamic Studies and RadicalismFrench-language works237,207