Assessment of Smoking Habits Among Patients with Chronic Disease at Hospitals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smoking is well-known risk factor for the development and progression of chronic diseases. Patients with chronic diseases are particularly vulnerable to the harmful effects of smoking, yet many continue to smoke despite their condition. This study aims to assess the smoking habits among patients with chronic diseases at hospitals and explore potential interventions to help them quit smoking. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to examine the prevalence of smoking among patients with chronic diseases, the impact of smoking on their health outcomes, and the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in this population. The results indicate that a significant proportion of patients with chronic diseases continue to smoke, despite the known risks. Various factors contribute to this behavior including nicotine addiction, lack of awareness about the impact of smoking on their condition, and limited access to smoking cessation resources. Healthcare providers play a crucial role in addressing smoking habits among patients with chronic diseases and should incorporate smoking cessation interventions into their routine care. The findings from this study highlight the importance of implementing tailored strategies to help patients with chronic diseases quit smoking and improve their overall health outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".