MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392421433 · doi:10.22236/komunika.v9i1.7897

Peran Penyuluh dalam Membangun Komunikasi Partisipatif Pada Kelompok Tani Di Kabupaten Bogor

2022· article· id· W4392421433 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKOMUNIKA · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Development and Management
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Komunikasi partisipatif merupakan kunci dalam sebuah proses komunikasi yang melibatkan masyarakat, khususnya di bidang pertanian dalam upaya penyampaian aspirasi dan pendapat. Pertanian yang berdaulat menjadi tujuan utama peningkatan petani lokal dalam memanfaatkan lahan pertanian. Kelompok tani mengorganisasikan para petani dalam mengembangkan usaha tani mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji tentang karakteristik kelompok tani di wilayah Ciawi, Kabupaten Bogor, mengetahui tingkat komunikasi partisipatif kelompok tani di wilayah Ciawi, mengetahui tingkat aksi kolektif pada kelompok tani di Ciawi, dan mengetahui hubungan antara kqarakteristik kelompok tani dengan komunikasi partisipatif mereka. Peneliti menggunakan pendekatan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode survei. Partisipan penelitian terdiri atas 30 orang petani di wilayah Ciawi, Kabupaten Bogor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan antara dukungan penyuluh dengan komunikasi partisipatif kelompok tani.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it