Effect of Model and Fractionated TMP Fines on Sheet Properties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two model fines, representing microfibrils and microgranules, and two fractions of TMP fines were used to demonstrate their effect on tensile strength and optical properties of handsheets formed from TMP and kraft fibers. The model microfibrils behave as a binder between fibers, thus improving tensile strength. The light scattering of kraft handsheets decreases but that of TMP handsheets increases. The model microgranules behave as a pigment by improving light scattering but preventing interfiber bonding. TMP fines, containing both types are capable of increasing tensile strength and light scattering simultaneously. The relation between tensile strength and light scattering depends on the proportion of fibrillated fines and granulated fines. The fractionated TMP fines of high surface area are shown to be very effective in improving the handsheet properties and the relation between tensile strength and light scattering is superior to that achieved by calcium carbonate filler.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it