MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392446306 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00003-2

Estimates of global mortality burden associated with short-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2·5)

2024· article· en· W4392446306 on OpenAlexaff
Wenhua Yu, Rongbin Xu, Tingting Ye, Michael J. Abramson, Lídia Morawska, Bin Jalaludin, Fay H. Johnston, Sarah B. Henderson, Luke D. Knibbs, Geoffrey Morgan, Éric Lavigne, Jane Heyworth, Simon Hales, Guy B. Marks, Alistair Woodward, Michelle L. Bell, Jonathan M. Samet, Jiangning Song, Shanshan Li, Yuming Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsHealth CanadaBC Centre for Disease Control
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research CouncilCentre for Air Pollution, Energy and Health ResearchChina Scholarship CouncilAustralian Research CouncilFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash UniversityMonash University
KeywordsPopulationMedicineDemographyEnvironmental healthMortality rateParticulatesBiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The acute health effects of short-term (hours to days) exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2·5 ) have been well documented; however, the global mortality burden attributable to this exposure has not been estimated. We aimed to estimate the global, regional, and urban mortality burden associated with short-term exposure to PM 2·5 and the spatiotemporal variations in this burden from 2000 to 2019. Methods We combined estimated global daily PM 2·5 concentrations, annual population counts, country-level mortality rates, and epidemiologically derived exposure–response functions to estimate the mortality attributable to short-term PM 2·5 exposure from 2000 to 2019, in the continental regions and in 13 189 urban centres worldwide at a spatial resolution of 0·1° × 0·1°. We tested the robustness of our mortality estimates with different theoretical minimum risk exposure levels, lag effects, and exposure–response functions. Findings Approximately 1 million (95% CI 690 000–1·3 million) premature deaths per year from 2000 to 2019 were attributable to short-term PM 2·5 exposure, representing 2·08% (1·41–2·75) of total global deaths or 17 (11–22) premature deaths per 100 000 population. Annually, 0·23 million (0·15 million–0·30 million) deaths attributable to short-term PM 2·5 exposure were in urban areas, constituting 22·74% of the total global deaths attributable to this cause and accounting for 2·30% (1·56–3·05) of total global deaths in urban areas. The sensitivity analyses showed that our worldwide estimates of mortality attributed to short-term PM 2·5 exposure were robust. Interpretation Short-term exposure to PM 2·5 contributes a substantial global mortality burden, particularly in Asia and Africa, as well as in global urban areas. Our results highlight the importance of mitigation strategies to reduce short-term exposure to air pollution and its adverse effects on human health. Funding Australian Research Council and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations141
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207