La agenda del BID en seguimiento de Quebec y Nuevo León: Actividades y programas estratégicos: Informe a la Cumbre Hemisférica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En la Cumbre de Quebec en 2001, el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo presentó una serie de programas estratégicos en las áreas de gobernabilidad democrática y desarrollo político, integración y desarrollo económico, medio ambiente y desarrollo sostenible, equidad y desarrollo social, y conectividad y desarrollo tecnológico. Desde entonces el BID, en cooperación con los países y con otras instituciones y organizaciones internacionales, ha desarrollado una amplia gama de actividades respaldando aquellos programas estratégicos que coinciden con las prioridades adoptadas por los Jefes de Estado y de Gobierno en la Declaración de Quebec y el Plan de Acción. Este informe enumera una serie de actividades y acciones financieras, técnicas e institucionales, ejecutadas por el BID desde 2001 en seguimiento de los programas estratégicos presentados en Quebec, así como de los mandatos adoptados en esa cita hemisférica y los de la Declaración de Nuevo León.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".