Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Tremor Relief in Atypical Parkisnsonism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) VIM-thalamotomy has established efficacy and safety in tremor relief in patients with essential tremor and Parkinson's disease. The efficacy and safety in patients with atypical parkinsonism have not been reported. Objective: = 3). Methods: Tremor was assessed in the treated hemibody using the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST). The motor Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSAR) was used in the MSA-P and motor sections of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) in DLB patients. Cognition was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Results: In MSA-P and DLB patients, there was immediate tremor relief. CRST scores measured on the treated side improved compared to baseline. During the follow-up of up to 1 year tremor reduction persisted. The change in CRST scores at different time points did not reach statistical significance, probably due to the small sample size. Adverse events were transient and resolved within a year. Conclusions: In our experience, FUS VIM-thalamotomy was effective in patients with MSA-P and DLB. Larger, controlled studies are needed to verify our preliminary observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".