MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392448938 · doi:10.1101/2024.03.01.582986

Electrocorticographic and Astrocytic Signatures of Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase Inhibition in the Triple Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease

2024· preprint· en· W4392448938 on OpenAlexafffund
Audrey Hector, Maria João da Costa Caiado, Tanya Leduc, Benoît Delignat‐Lavaud, Julien Dufort‐Gervais, Clément Bourguignon, Jean‐Marc Lina, Karl J. L. Fernandes, Jonathan Brouillette, Valérie Mongrain

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeÉcole de Technologie SupérieureCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalCanadian Sleep & Circadian NetworkCentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services SociauxUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de MontréalRijksuniversiteit Groningen
KeywordsTransgeneGenetically modified mouseNeuroscienceDiseaseBiologyMedicineBiochemistryGenePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The symptomatology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) includes cognitive deficits and sleep disturbances. Recent findings suggest the involvement of dysfunctions in lipid metabolism, such as oleic acid build-up, in the brain of AD patients and animal models. In addition, the inhibition of stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), a lipid-converting enzyme, was shown to restore memory in triple transgenic (3xTg)-AD mice. In the brain, astrocytes regulate the synthesis of specific lipids. Alterations in astrocytes and their function were reported in AD patients and animal models, and astrocytes have been implicated in the regulation of sleep. However, the relationship between sleep disturbances, astrocytes and lipid metabolism remains to be explored in AD. This project thus aimed at assessing whether the inhibition of SCD restores sleep in 3xTg-AD mice, and whether this associated with modifications in astrocytic function. Wild-type (WT) and 3xTg-AD female mice (4-months old) received intracerebroventricular infusion of a SCD inhibitor (SCDi) or vehicle for 28 days, and a 24-hour electrocorticographic (ECoG) recording was conducted post-treatment. Post-mortem brain slices were stained for the astrocytic markers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and 10-formyltetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (ALDH1L1) to perform cell counting and/or morphological evaluation in the hippocampus, lateral hypothalamus and thalamus. The results indicate that the reduced time spent awake and increased time spent in slow wave sleep (SWS) in 3xTg-AD mice was not restored by the SCDi treatment. Similar observations were made concerning the increased number of wake and SWS bouts in 3xTg-AD mice. Rhythmic and scale-free ECoG activity were markedly altered in 3xTg-AD mice for all wake/sleep states, and SCDi significantly altered these phenotypes in a different manner in mutant mice in comparison to WT mice. GFAP- and ALDH1L1-positive cell densities were elevated in the hippocampus and lateral hypothalamus/thalamus of 3x-Tg-AD mice, respectively, and SCDi rescued the increase in the CA1 region in particular. Overall, these findings suggest that the multiple wake/sleep alterations in 3xTg-AD mice are not substantially restored by targeting lipid metabolism using SCD inhibition, at least for the targeted age window, but that this treatment can revert hippocampal changes in astrocytes. This work will benefit the understanding of the pathophysiology related to AD and associated sleep disturbances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207