Heat transfer analysis of FRP–strengthened RC columns under fire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of externally bonded Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) systems is becoming more relevant due to their superior performance in many structural applications. However, fire or elevated temperature exposure is a major concern for FRP systems due to the deterioration of the epoxy adhesive. This paper investigates the fire performance of unstrengthened and Carbon FRP (CFRP) strengthened Reinforced Concrete (RC) columns with and without fireproofing insulation. Four columns were modeled using the finite element software package ABAQUS to carry out the heat transfer analysis. All four columns were exposed to fire according to the ASTM E119 standard fire curve with an exposure period of three hours. The temperature-time curves were plotted 50 mm deep into the concrete, and 100 mm deep into the concrete, and at the longitudinal reinforcement. The results showed no noticeable improvement in the fire performance of RC columns with the addition of CFRP layers, where the temperature readings were almost the same. However, the use of the fireproofing insulation significantly affected the fire performance where the temperature at different times was significantly lower for the insulated columns compared to the uninsulated columns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".