The rebirth of urea oxidation reaction for power-to-X and beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the longstanding interest in urea oxidation reaction (UOR), the identification of reaction products under conventional conditions was only reported recently. It turns out that the initially thought “sustainable pathway”, leading to harmless products, represents just a small fraction of the overall reaction mechanism. This is detrimental as the use of urea-rich aqueous feeds for H2 production, along with their remediation through UOR, constitutes perhaps the most important added value of this process for power-to-X and clinical applications. Nonetheless, promising strategies favoring the formation of environmentally friendly products over harmful overoxidized ones already exist. This is expected to lead to a “rebirth” of this research field and open the quest for ultimate selectivity to ensure the complete sustainability of UOR. Therefore, the systematic analysis of reaction products, the elucidation of mechanisms for improving N2 faradaic efficiency, and the design of selective catalysts should be the next focus of research in the field of UOR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".