MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392466898 · doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1389519

Editorial: Multi-modal approaches to assess the impact of orthopaedic disease on lower extremity joint function and health

2024· editorial· en· W4392466898 on OpenAlexaff
Malek Adouni, Yosra Cherni, Amir Esrafilian, Michael A. Samaan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Sports and Active Living · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsBiomechanicsModalPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineJoint (building)Physical therapyEngineeringAnatomyStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two of the papers within this research topic provided insight into lateral malleolar fractures and distal femoral fractures by integrating imaging-based techniques to develop more effective surgical interventions. The first fracture-related paper by Wang et al. delves into the intricate details of Type B lateral malleolar fractures. By employing a three-dimensional perspective, it provides a novel understanding of fracture apexes, which is crucial for developing more effective surgical treatments. This research not only contributes to the field of orthopedic surgery but also offers practical insights for clinicians dealing with such fractures. The second fracture-related paper by Chen et al. focused on identifying fracture lines and comminution zones in AO/OTA types 33A and 33C distal femoral fractures using three-dimensional computed tomography mapping. The distinct features observed in these fractures have significant implications for surgical approaches and internal fixation strategies. The findings, particularly the involvement of the medial femoral epiphysis in 33C fractures, provide valuable insights for selecting surgical approaches, optimizing internal fixation strategies, and guiding the placement of plates or bridging fixation for stabilizing the medial column. These results serve as essential guidelines for both surgical planning and biomechanical studies.A narrative review article by Keles et al. focused on the biomechanics of muscle-tendon units in the knee and ankle joints in the context of cerebral palsy. This comprehensive review shed light on the challenges in measuring and modeling muscle forces in people with cerebral palsy. The article also emphasizes the potential for advancements in clinical management and rehabilitation strategies for individuals with cerebral palsy. By bringing attention to these issues, the article emphasizes the potential for advancements in clinical management and rehabilitation strategies for individuals with cerebral palsy, an understudied patient population in the field of biomechanics.The next article by Chang et al. investigated the application of cutting-edge technology in sports science. By employing inertial measurement units driven by deep learning algorithms to clarify the stages of runner fatigue, hence it opens new avenues for research into athletic performance and injury prevention. This approach not only enhances our understanding of biomechanics and physiology in sports but also it shows how technological innovations can be connected in the field of orthopedic health.Advances in motion capture and musculoskeletal modeling have played a crucial role in the development and application of robotic technologies for rehabilitation. Lower limb exoskeletons are designed to assist human movement and enhance physiological performance. However, performance and control stability are affected by some model parameters and control algorithms. A manuscript by Gao et al. sought to utilize numerical optimization to adjust the stiffness and damping parameters of a rehabilitation robot to more optimally and accurately track the gait profile in the human-robot interaction.The evaluation of patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stress is important in understanding the mechanism of PFJ pain. Despite the obvious clinical need to assess PFJ stress, the article by Wang et al. highlights the absence of a definitive "gold standard" for assessment and ongoing efforts to enhance the accuracy of PFJ stress estimations. This article has identified and categorized the various methods used to estimate PFJ stress, the absence of a standardized assessment and the significance of precise evaluation in designing tissue-engineered constructs and evaluating patient recovery. The proposed evaluation scheme prompts future studies to focus on establishing modeling-based platforms for precise PFJ stress calculations, contributing to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of PFJ pain and optimizing PFJ treatment programs.Falls are a major concern in the population as they are a leading cause of mortality. The ability to recover from a trip and regain balance, in order to prevent risk of falling, is not well understood. The paper by Namayeshi et al. utilized computational modeling to evaluate the role of the plantar flexor muscle in trip recovery during walking. This study demonstrated the significance of the ankle plantar flexor musculature in successful recovery after tripping during walking and suggests that plantar flexor muscle weakness is an important factor in the risk of tripping during walking. Together, all the articles within this research topic represent a multifaceted exploration of orthopedic health. These articles not only reflect the interdisciplinary nature of current orthopedic research but also underline the capability for integrating various scientific, technological and computational approaches to enhance our management of orthopedic diseases. This special issue thus serves as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and practitioners in the field, offering insights into the complexities of joint function and health in orthopedic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0130.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Sports and Active LivingSame topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFrench-language works237,207