MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392469923 · doi:10.1038/s41581-024-00818-0

Clinical practice recommendations for kidney involvement in tuberous sclerosis complex: a consensus statement by the ERKNet Working Group for Autosomal Dominant Structural Kidney Disorders and the ERA Genes & Kidney Working Group

2024· review· en· W4392469923 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Reviews Nephrology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersMedizinische Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgVlaamse regeringGIS-Institut des Maladies RaresUniversität des SaarlandesKU LeuvenUniversität ZürichFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBrigham and Women's HospitalAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgUniversity College LondonUniversité Catholique de LouvainUniversität zu KölnUniversité de LiègeEuropean CommissionUniversité de MontréalUniversitätsklinikum KölnLam ResearchVrije Universiteit BrusselGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthEuropean Rare Kidney Disease Reference NetworkEusko Jaurlaritza
KeywordsTuberous sclerosisMedicineKidneyPsychological interventionIntensive care medicineMultidisciplinary approachKidney diseasePathologyKidney disorderClinical PracticeBioinformaticsInternal medicinePsychiatryFamily medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it