Penaksiran Repeatibilitas Produk Susu Sapi FH di Wilayah Kerja KUD Karya Nugraha Kelurahan Cipari Kecamatan Cigugur Kabupaten Kuningan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAKPenelitian dilakukan pada sapi perah Fries Holstein (FH) di wilayah kerja KUD Karya Nugraha Kelurahan Cipari Kecamatan Cigugur Kabupaten kuningan selama 10 hari, 4 – 13 September 2008. Repeatabilitas susu sapi perah FH menggunakan catatan produksi susu laktasi pertama, kedua, ketiga dan kedua, ketiga, keempat menggunakan metode survey. Setelah perhitungan Repeatabilitas dilanjutkan dengan menghitung kecermatan nilai taksiran tersebut. Penilitian menggunakan catatan 360 produksi susu dari 90 ekor sapi induk yang mempunyai catatan laktasi 1 – 4. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa penggunaan catatan laktasi 1,2,3 dan catatan laktasi 2,3,4 memberikan hasil taksiran repeatabilitas dan kecermatan yang berbeda. Untuk penaksiran repeatabilitas dan kecermatannya sebaiknya menggunakan laktasi 1, 2, dan 3 karena nilai repeatabilitas dan kecermatan 0.42 0,065, sedangkan catatan laktasi 2, 3, 4 memberikan nilai repeatabilitas dan kecermatan 0,33 0,068.Kata Kunci : Sapi Perah FH, Repeatabilitas, Laktasi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".