Moral Values in the Movie Script The Breadwinner (2017) by Anita Doron
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research discussed moral values in the movie script by Anita Doron, an award-winning Canadian-Hungarian writer. The aims of the research were to find out the types of moral values and the impact of moral values contained in The Breadwinner movie script to see how humans act as humans. The qualitative descriptive method was used in this research to explain gaining data through a sociological approach. The theory of Hornby was employed to analyze the types of moral values and to see what moral values are, and the theory of Thomas Lickona was used to analyze the impact. Moral values are dominant in the Breadwinner movie script, and the most dominant of all types was courage. The result showed that there were 8 of the 11 types of moral values found in the movie script of The Breadwinner namely courage, humbleness, honesty, sympathy to others, cooperative, thankfulness, kind-hearted, and love and affection. In The movie script, it was also found that there were only 4 types of impact moral values, namely honesty, courage, honor and love and affection based on Thomas Lickona's theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".