MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392485970 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.140106

Spurious Trip Rate Optimization Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

2024· article· en· W4392485970 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Boukrouma Houcem Eddine, Riad Bendib

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Parking Systems Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpurious relationshipParticle swarm optimizationMulti-swarm optimizationAlgorithmComputer scienceMetaheuristicMathematical optimizationOptimization algorithmMathematicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to enhance the reliability of emergency shutdown systems in the electric production industry by addressing spurious activations.Such activations may lead to production losses, stress on affected components and systems, and increase hazards during the restoration process of the system and losing the trust in safety system.This can lead to ignorance of serious detections of dangerous situations.Hence, the optimization and control of spurious activations becomes imperative for ensuring both efficiency and cost-effectiveness of any industrial plant.In the last few decays, several optimization meta-heuristic techniques are developed in literature.Particle swarm optimization is power and robust tool dedicated to solve complex problems.This paper presents a comprehensive review of the application of particle swarm optimization to minimize spurious trip rate by the optimization of performance parameters of emergency shutdown system installed in a combined cycle power plant.The results show that the obtained spurious activations rate is minimum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicSmart Parking Systems ResearchFrench-language works237,207