MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gross Pathological Study of Gastric Dilatation in a Labrador Dog

2023· article· en· W4392488863 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. Behera, N. Pazhanivel, Ganne Venkata Sudhakar Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Immunology and Immunopathology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologicalMedicineVeterinary medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gastric dilatation is an acute, life-threatening medical emergency that requires prompt medical attention for a successful outcome. The carcass of a one-year-and-one-month-old male Labrador Retriever dog was presented to the Department of Veterinary Pathology, Madras Veterinary College, TANUVAS, Chennai-600 007 for necropsy. The dog had a history of salivation, retching, abdominal distension, and recurrent bloat for one month. A thorough necropsy was conducted, and the observed gross lesions were documented. Significant stomach dilatation accompanied by severe congestion of the gastric mucosa was noted. The intestines revealed congestion and were filled with yellow-colored contents. Mild hepatomegaly, along with congestion on the serosal surface, was observed in the liver. The heart chambers contained clotted blood, and the kidney capsules were easily peeled off, revealing mild congestion on the cortical surface. Splenomegaly was evident, accompanied by severe congestion. Based on the history and gross pathological findings, the confirmed cause of death was attributed to gastric dilatation, compounded by shock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Immunology and ImmunopathologySame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207