B cell depletion with anti-CD20 promotes neuroprotection in a BAFF-dependent manner in mice and humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anti-CD20 therapy to deplete B cells is highly efficacious in preventing new white matter lesions in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but its protective capacity against gray matter injury and axonal damage is unclear. In a passive experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model whereby T H 17 cells promote brain leptomeningeal immune cell aggregates, we found that anti-CD20 treatment effectively spared myelin content and prevented myeloid cell activation, oxidative damage, and mitochondrial stress in the subpial gray matter. Anti-CD20 treatment increased B cell survival factor (BAFF) in the serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and leptomeninges of mice with EAE. Although anti-CD20 prevented gray matter demyelination, axonal loss, and neuronal atrophy, co-treatment with anti-BAFF abrogated these benefits. Consistent with the murine studies, we observed that elevated BAFF concentrations after anti-CD20 treatment in patients with RRMS were associated with better clinical outcomes. Moreover, BAFF promoted survival of human neurons in vitro. Together, our data demonstrate that BAFF exerts beneficial functions in MS and EAE in the context of anti-CD20 treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".