MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392507814 · doi:10.1002/jmri.29332

Quantifying Brain Myelin Water Fraction in a Guinea Pig Model of Spontaneous Intrauterine Growth Restriction

2024· article· en· W4392507814 on OpenAlexafffund
Simran Sethi, Lanette J. Friesen‐Waldner, Timothy R.H. Regnault, Charles A. McKenzie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFetusIntrauterine growth restrictionEndocrinologyInternal medicineCorpus callosumMedicineWhite matterGestationBrain sizePregnancyAnatomyMagnetic resonance imagingBiologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is an obstetrical condition where a fetus has not achieved its genetic potential. A consequence of IUGR is a decrease in brain myelin content. Myelin water imaging (MWI) has been used to assess fetal myelin water fraction (MWF) and might potentially assess myelination changes associated with IUGR. Purpose To quantify and compare the MWF of non‐IUGR and IUGR fetal guinea pigs (GPs) in late gestation. Study Type Prospective animal model. Animal Model Dunkin‐Hartley GP model of spontaneous IUGR (mean ± SD: 60 ± 1.2 days gestation; 19 IUGR, 52 control). Field Strength/Sequence Eight spoiled gradient‐recalled (SPGR) gradient echo volumes (flip angles [α]: 2°–16°), and two sets of eight balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) gradient echo volumes (α: 8° – 64°), at 0° and 180° phase increments, at 3.0 T. Assessment MWF maps were generated for each fetal GP brain using multicomponent driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1/T2 (mcDESPOT). MWF was quantified in the fetal corpus callosum (CC), fornix (FOR), parasagittal white matter (PSW), and whole fetal brain. Statistical Tests Linear regression was performed between five fetal IUGR markers (body volume, body‐to‐pregnancy volume ratio, brain‐to‐liver volume ratio, brain‐to‐placenta volume ratio, and brain‐to‐body volume ratio) and MWF (coefficient of determination, R2). A t‐test with a linear mixed model compared the MWF of non‐IUGR and IUGR fetal GPs (significance was determined at α < 0.05). Results The MWF of the control fetuses are (mean ± SD): 0.23 ± 0.02 (CC), 0.31 ± 0.02 (FOR), 0.28 ± 0.02 (PSW), and 0.20 ± 0.01 (whole brain). The MWF of the IUGR fetuses are (mean ± SD): 0.19 ± 0.02 (CC), 0.27 ± 0.01 (FOR), 0.24 ± 0.03 (PSW), and 0.16 ± 0.01 (whole brain). Significant differences in MWF were found between the non‐IUGR and IUGR fetuses in every comparison. Data Conclusion The mean MWF of IUGR fetal GPs is significantly lower than non‐IUGR fetal GPs. Evidence Level 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207