MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392536807

Few sedimentary aspects of volcanic debris avalanches deposits

2015· preprint· fr· W4392536807 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karine Bernard

Bibliographic record

Venuetheses.fr (ABES) · 2015
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDebrisGeologyVolcanoSedimentary rockGeochemistryEarth scienceGeomorphologyOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La caractérisation granulaire de dépôts hétérométriques organisés en paquets glissés implique une démarche systématique afin d'optimiser l'extraction de données et de les rendre comparables. La quantification des rapports structures-fractions granulaires a permis de mettre en évidence des cinématiques localisées, inscrites dans des cinématiques d'ordre I. Les rides de Tutupaca, le lobe distal du Pichu-Pichu, l'effondrement du Misti au Pérou; la levée latérale du Cheix et le charriage distal de Perrier aux Mt Dore ; les transformations de Meager au Canada, de la Qda San Lazaro au Pérou, de Pardines en France ont été quantifiés. Héritage volcanique, ségrégations granulaires, cataclases syn-tectoniques sont des précurseurs aux modifications matricielles, à l'origine des transformations distales en lahars. Les données ainsi comparées permettent de proposer des classifications sédimentologiques distinguant les effondrements proximaux des transformations par les fluides ( hydrothermaux, eau). Seules quelques équations regroupent l'ensemble de ces dépôts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuetheses.fr (ABES)Same topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207