Aerial Grasping of an Object in the Strong Wind: Robust Control of an Aerial Manipulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>An aerial manipulator is a new kind of flying robot system composed of a rotorcraft unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and a multi-link robotic arm. It gives the flying robot the capacity to complete manipulation tasks. Steady flight is essential for an aerial manipulator to complete manipulation tasks. This paper focuses on the steady flight control performance of the aerial manipulator. A separate control strategy is used in the aerial manipulator system, in which the UAV and the manipulator are controlled separately. In order to complete tasks in environments with strong wind disturbance, an acceleration feedback enhanced robust <em>H</em>∞ controller was designed for the UAV in the aerial manipulator. The controller is based on the hierarchical inner-outer loop control structure of the UAV and composed of a robust <em>H</em>∞ controller and acceleration feedback enhanced term, which is used to compensate for the wind disturbance. Experimental results of aerial grasping of a target object show that the controller can suppress the wind disturbance effectively, and make the aerial manipulator hover steadily with sufficient accuracy to complete aerial manipulation tasks in strong wind.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".