MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392546650 · doi:10.3390/pr12030527

Research on the Scaling Mechanism and Countermeasures of Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs Based on Machine Learning

2024· article· en· W4392546650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcesses · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMechanism (biology)ScalingTight gasPetroleum engineeringGeologyComputer scienceMathematicsEpistemologyHydraulic fracturingPhilosophyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sulige gas field is a typical “three lows” (low permeability, low pressure, and low abundance) tight sandstone gas reservoir, with formation pressures often characterized by abnormally high or low pressures. The complex geological features of the reservoir further deviate from conventional understanding, impacting the effective implementation of wellbore blockage removal measures. Therefore, it is imperative to establish the wellbore blockage mechanism, prediction model, and effective prevention measures for the target area. In this study, based on field data, we first experimentally analyzed the water quality and types of blockage in the target area. Subsequently, utilizing a BP neural network model, we established a model for predicting the risk of wellbore blockage and analyzing mitigation measures in the target reservoir. The model’s prediction results, consistent with on-site actual results, demonstrate its reliability and accuracy. Experimental results show that the water quality in the target area is mainly a CaCl2 type, and the predominant scales produced are CaCO3 and BaSO4. Model calculations reveal that temperature, pressure, and ion concentration all influence scaling, with BaSO4 more influenced by pressure and CaCO3 more influenced by temperature. Under the combined effect of temperature, pressure, and ion concentration, different types of scales exhibit distinct trends in scaling quantity. Combining scaling quantity calculations with wellbore contraction ratios, it was found that when the temperature, pressure, and ion concentration are within a certain range, the wellbore contraction rate can be controlled below 4%. At this point, the wellbore scaling risk is minimal, and preventive measures against wellbore scaling can be achieved by adjusting production systems, considering practical production conditions. This study investigates the mechanism of scaling in wellbores of tight sandstone gas reservoirs and proposes a cost-effective scaling prevention measure. This approach can guide the prediction of scaling risks and the implementation of scaling prevention measures for gas wells in tight sandstone reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it