Mechanical and energy absorption behavior of an innovative high-performance auxetic structure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Auxetic structures possess high energy absorption, especially under impact loads that are influenced by their negative Poisson’s ratio (NPR). This negative ratio is due to their specific microstructural designs. In this article, newly modified designs for an existing chiral auxetic structure have been proposed and their mechanical and energy absorption performances have been investigated. In the proposed designs, the geometry of slots in an available peanut-shaped auxetic structure has been modified and some extra masses have been removed to introduce innovative auxetic structures with higher NPRs, higher energy absorption, and lower structural weight. By performing finite element simulations in ABAQUS software, it has been found that the proposed modifications in the design of the available auxetic structure result in up to 7.3% and 76.6% increases in Poisson’s ratio and energy absorption respectively. The accuracy of simulations has also been confirmed by performing a comparison study with some available results of experimental tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it