Effect Of Dietary Supplementation Of Biofloc Meal With Tryptophan &Lysine On Growth And Survival Of Mono Sex Tilpa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 60-day indoor growth trial was conducted to study the effect of dietary supplementation of biofloc meal with tryptophan and lysine on growth and survival of mono sex tilapia. Six isonitrogenous and isoenergetic experimental diets wereformulated viz., as 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4% tryptophan (D1,D2,D3) and 1.2%, 1.4%, 1.8% lysine(D4,D5,D6) enriched with 20%bioflocmeal included diets.This feeding trial was conducted in 18 numbers of 40 L plastic troughs in triplicates, utilizing mono sex tilapias weighing with an average of 2 g size. During the experimental period, water quality parameters were measured and recorded daily. Among the experimental diets highest mean body weight of tilapia were recorded in D4 (46.35±3.95g) followed by D2 (41.37±1.98g), D5 (40.1±0.87 g) and D1 (34.36±0.96 g). Hence, the present study was assessed that diet with 20% biofloc meal supplemented with 1.2 % lysine can improve the growth and survival of mono sex tilapia without any adverse effect on the fish performance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".