MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Geochemistry of hydrothermal and stream sedimentary rutile in the Tiegelongnan porphyry-epithermal Cu (Au) deposit, Tibet: A tool for exploration

2024· article· en· W4392563613 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Yang, Georges Beaudoin, Yang Song, Juxing Tang, Yiyun Wang, Yannick Buret, Xiaowen Huang, Xinghai Lang, Bin Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryHydrothermal circulationSedimentary rockRutilePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rutile is a common and stable mineral in porphyry Cu deposits, and morphology and geochemistry of rutile are recognized as a potential indicator mineral for exploration. In this study, we investigate physical features and chemical composition of hydrothermal rutile in the Tiegelongnan porphyry-epithermal system, as well as rutile in stream sediments nearby to establish a method to apply rutile as an exploration proxy. Four stages of hydrothermal rutile have been identified. Potassic alteration stage rutile (Rt1) is associated with biotite, with elongated and acicular shape and small grain size (20–50 μm). Rutile from lower temperature phyllic alteration (Rt2), quartz veins (Rt3), and advanced argillic alteration (Rt4), has characteristic sector zoning and larger grain size (50–150 μm). The sector zoning is more commonly present in Rt2, Rt3, Rt4, that are associated with high-grade Cu mineralization, and is associated with incorporation of W, Fe, V, Sn, and Zr. The earlier rutile (Rt1) also has a geochemical signature different from the other three types of rutile, characterized by significantly lower Al, Cu, Zr, Nb, Sn, Hf, and higher Sc and Fe contents. Low-temperature hydrothermal alteration stage rutile (Rt2, 3, 4) share many geochemical similarities, but Rt3 has higher Nb and Ta contents (median = 3371.0 and 176.0 ppm, respectively), whereas Rt4 has higher Sb content (median = 24.3 ppm). Rutile trace element data from this study and literature are integrated to develop a Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) multivariate statistics plots that can discriminate porphyry Cu deposit rutile from orogenic gold and VHMS deposits, as well as rutile from different alteration stages. The PLS-DA plots predict that stream sedimentary gold-bearing rutile (RtSAu) adjacent to the Tiegelongnan deposit are derived from the deposit, and mainly from low-temperature phyllic and advanced argillic alteration stages. This is consistent with geochemical similarity between the RtSAu and the Tiegelongnan low-temperature hydrothermal rutile (Rt2 + Rt4). This is further confirmed by a U-Pb age of 125.3 ± 4.7 Ma (n = 24, 2σ) for RtSAu, which is consistent with the main porphyry mineralization age of ∼ 120 Ma in the Tiegelongnan deposit. We infer that the RtSAu may have formed during the ∼120 Ma epithermal system at Tiegelongnan, which has already largely eroded. In general, our findings prove the capability of using rutile, by combing the texture, geochemical compositions, geochronology, PLS-DA tools, and their spatial distribution, as a proxy mineral for the exploration of porphyry Cu deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207