iNGNN-DTI: prediction of drug–target interaction with interpretable nested graph neural network and pretrained molecule models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Drug-target interaction (DTI) prediction aims to identify interactions between drugs and protein targets. Deep learning can automatically learn discriminative features from drug and protein target representations for DTI prediction, but challenges remain, making it an open question. Existing approaches encode drugs and targets into features using deep learning models, but they often lack explanations for underlying interactions. Moreover, limited labeled DTIs in the chemical space can hinder model generalization. RESULTS: We propose an interpretable nested graph neural network for DTI prediction (iNGNN-DTI) using pre-trained molecule and protein models. The analysis is conducted on graph data representing drugs and targets by using a specific type of nested graph neural network, in which the target graphs are created based on 3D structures using Alphafold2. This architecture is highly expressive in capturing substructures of the graph data. We use a cross-attention module to capture interaction information between the substructures of drugs and targets. To improve feature representations, we integrate features learned by models that are pre-trained on large unlabeled small molecule and protein datasets, respectively. We evaluate our model on three benchmark datasets, and it shows a consistent improvement on all baseline models in all datasets. We also run an experiment with previously unseen drugs or targets in the test set, and our model outperforms all of the baselines. Furthermore, the iNGNN-DTI can provide more insights into the interaction by visualizing the weights learned by the cross-attention module. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of the algorithm is available at https://github.com/syan1992/iNGNN-DTI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it