Technical and economic assessments of a novel multigeneration system based on desalination and liquid air energy storage
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The practical pioneering methodologies can be employed to improve the efficiency of energy systems. To attain the desired objectives in exergy and economic studies, original configurations alongside practical methodologies are sought after. In this research, an advanced multigeneration system involving liquid air energy storage and desalination system is designed. The system has the potential to generate a wide range of products to increase the preferences of the system both technically and economically. The system produces sodium hypochlorite, cooling, electricity, heating, hydrogen, and potable water. The results from the conducted research revealed that the system can generate 5901 kW electricity power while the round-trip efficiencies from energetic and exergetic prospects are 65.8 % and 59.6 %, respectively. The total EDR from the system is approximately 16 MW. The noteworthy outcomes from economic assessments revealed that the payback periods of the system with and without renewable energy-powered systems are 2.7 and 2.9 years, respectively. Combining chemical and thermomechanical energy storage systems with process facilities provides a cutting-edge subject matter. The integrated energy storage system with the desalination unit indicates that over the peak-shaving periods, auxiliary products can be produced while renewable energy systems charge the energy storage system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it