MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392576339 · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae168

<i>Blastocrithidia nonstop</i> mitochondrial genome and its expression are remarkably insulated from nuclear codon reassignment

2024· article· en· W4392576339 on OpenAlexaff
Dmitry A. Afonin, Evgeny S. Gerasimov, Ingrid Škodová‐Sveráková, Kristína Záhonová, Ondřej Gahura, Amanda T. S. Albanaz, Eva Myšková, Anastassia Bykova, Zdeněk Paris, Julius Lukeš, Fred R. Opperdoes, Anton Horváth, Sara L. Zimmer, Vyacheslav Yurchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueNucleic Acids Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrypanosoma species research and implications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersRussian Science FoundationOstravská Univerzita v OstravěVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaGrantová Agentura České RepublikyEuropean Regional Development FundMinistry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
KeywordsNonStopBiologyRNA editingGeneticsNuclear geneGenomeMitochondrial DNAGeneGenetic codeTransfer RNAStop codonCodon usage biasTranscriptomeRNAComputational biologyGene expressionDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The canonical stop codons of the nuclear genome of the trypanosomatid Blastocrithidia nonstop are recoded. Here, we investigated the effect of this recoding on the mitochondrial genome and gene expression. Trypanosomatids possess a single mitochondrion and protein-coding transcripts of this genome require RNA editing in order to generate open reading frames of many transcripts encoded as 'cryptogenes'. Small RNAs that can number in the hundreds direct editing and produce a mitochondrial transcriptome of unusual complexity. We find B. nonstop to have a typical trypanosomatid mitochondrial genetic code, which presumably requires the mitochondrion to disable utilization of the two nucleus-encoded suppressor tRNAs, which appear to be imported into the organelle. Alterations of the protein factors responsible for mRNA editing were also documented, but they have likely originated from sources other than B. nonstop nuclear genome recoding. The population of guide RNAs directing editing is minimal, yet virtually all genes for the plethora of known editing factors are still present. Most intriguingly, despite lacking complex I cryptogene guide RNAs, these cryptogene transcripts are stochastically edited to high levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNucleic Acids ResearchSame topicTrypanosoma species research and implicationsFrench-language works237,207