Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesUniversité Catholique de LouvainMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog RazvojaInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronWigner Fizikai Kutatóközpont, Magyar Tudományos AkadémiaLaboratorio Nacional de Supercómputo del Sureste de MexicoInstituto de Física de CantabriaMinistry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, ThailandNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroKementerian Pendidikan MalaysiaRoyal Holloway, University of LondonMinistry of Science,Technology and ResearchU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPakistan Atomic Energy CommissionBrunel University LondonUniversity of GlasgowRWTH Aachen UniversityInstitute of High Energy PhysicsNarodowe Centrum NaukiBundesministerium für Bildung und FrauenCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesFermilabBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de PueblaInstitute for Research in Fundamental SciencesMinistry of Education and ScienceFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíCentro Svizzero di Calcolo ScientificoShota Rustaveli National Science FoundationCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostUniversiti MalayaKorea Institute of Science and Technology InformationMinistry for Business Innovation and EmploymentFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do SulOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchNational Science and Technology Development AgencyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Research Foundation of KoreaBulgarian National Science FundUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonUniversity of IoanninaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUniversity of California, San DiegoConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSAustrian Science FundSecretaría de Educación PúblicaBundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftChinese Academy of SciencesEuropean Research CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAcademy of FinlandMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaIzglītības un zinātnes ministrijaKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasSecretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e InnovaciónDepartment of Atomic Energy, Government of IndiaKyungpook National UniversityNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineUniversity of BristolDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaHelsinki Institute of PhysicsTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchScience and Technology Facilities CouncilTürkiye Enerji, Nükleer ve Maden Araştırma KurumuMinistarstvo znanosti i obrazovanjaCERNAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónKeemilise ja Bioloogilise Füüsika InstituutHelmholtz-GemeinschaftNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterUniversity of OxfordNational Science FoundationPurdue UniversityUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnBaylor UniversityFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroSan Diego Supercomputer CenterUniversity of Colorado BoulderUniversity of FloridaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuRutherford Appleton LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyQuaid-i-Azam UniversityConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaVanderbilt UniversityImperial College LondonQueen Mary University of LondonScience Foundation Ireland
KeywordsAlpha (finance)PhysicsCoupling (piping)Energy (signal processing)Atomic physicsNuclear physicsMaterials scienceQuantum mechanicsMathematicsStatistics
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexEnergy correlators that describe energy-weighted distances between two or three particles in a hadronic jet are measured using an event sample of sqrt[s]=13 TeV proton-proton collisions collected by the CMS experiment and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.3 fb^{-1}. The measured distributions are consistent with the trends in the simulation that reveal two key features of the strong interaction: confinement and asymptotic freedom. By comparing the ratio of the measured three- and two-particle energy correlator distributions with theoretical calculations that resum collinear emissions at approximate next-to-next-to-leading-logarithmic accuracy matched to a next-to-leading-order calculation, the strong coupling is determined at the Z boson mass: α_{S}(m_{Z})=0.1229_{-0.0050}^{+0.0040}, the most precise α_{S}(m_{Z}) value obtained using jet substructure observables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.999
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
