MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392577477 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-12107

Experimental results on the H2-H2 and H2 -He collisional-induced absorption coefficients at typical Jupiter’s upper tropospheric conditions. 

2024· preprint· en· W4392577477 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francesca Vitali, Stefania Stefani, G. Piccioni, D. Grassi, Marcel Snels

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJupiter (rocket family)Absorption (acoustics)TroposphereChemistryHydrogenPhysicsAtmospheric sciencesAstronomyOpticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jupiter’s atmosphere is primarily composed of molecular hydrogen and helium with a mixing ratio almost identical to our Sun.Since the atmosphere of this gaseous giant represents a high-density environment, spanning many orders of magnitude along its radius, the H2-H2 and H2-He Collision Induced Absorption (CIA) bands represent its main source of opacity in the infrared part of the spectrum, particularly between 1 and 5 μm, a spectral range widely used by remote sensing instruments.Thus, it is of primary importance to have experimental data on the CIA absorption and to compare them with the theoretical models present in the literature, to have the most accurate estimation of Jupiter’s atmospheric opacity, at least for the CIA.Consequently, measurements of the hydrogen CIA fundamental band have been performed at three different temperatures and pressure conditions typical of the Jovian upper-tropospheric profile [1], using an H2-He mixture with 13.8 % helium, a typical value of Jupiter’s atmosphere.For this scope, we used an experimental setup called PASSxS, which allows us to record absorption spectra in the spectral range from 1 to 6 μm.It comprises two stainless steel concentric vessels, as shown in Figure 1. The inner one contains the gas or mixture of gases under investigation, while the external one can be evacuated to ensure thermal insulation of the sample chamber from the external environment.The inner vessel contains a Multi-Pass cell, characterized by an optical path of about 3.2 m, coupled with an FT-IR spectrometer. The spectral resolution achievable with the present FT-IR spans from 0.06 to 10 cm-1. For a more detailed description of the experimental setup refer to [2].Figure 2 shows the experimental absorption coefficients (blue curve) acquired at 402 K and 19.2 bar, compared with Abel’s theoretical model [3] (red curve). The band shows a maximum absorption around 4200 cm-1 where the absorption coefficients reach a value of 5.8 10-4 cm-1.Some discrepancies between the data and the model are evident and have to be further investigated. This work presents the first experimental study of the CIA fundamental band of H2-He at this high temperature.Since our experimental setup can reach temperatures up to 550 K, one of the main objectives will be to perform measurements at still higher temperatures, to further investigate a not-yet explored temperature range (work in progress at the time of this abstract).Figure 2 also shows the so-called interference dips [4] around 4150 cm-1, which represent a lack of absorption at specific wavelengths. The spectral resolution of our setup allowed, for the first time, to resolve four interference dips.A further investigation of these features might be important for future modeling.Acknowledgments: This work has been developed under the ASI-INAF agreement n. 2023-6-HH.0.References:[1] A. Seiff (1997), Science Vol 276, pp.102-104.[2] M. Snels et al. (2021), AMT 14, 7187–7197.[3] M. Abel et al. (2012), The Journal of Chemical Physics, 136.[4] J. Van Kranendonk (1968), Canadian Journal of Physics Vol. 46, N. 10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstro and Planetary Science→French-language works237,207→