Bibliographic record
Abstract
Light scattered by subwavelength dielectric nanoantennas can be manipulated by engineering the antennas' Mie resonances. Spectral overlapping of the dipole-like electric and magnetic Mie resonances results in suppression of backward scattering. This phenomenon is known as Forward Kerker effect which enables the individual nanoantennas to act as Huygens' scatterers. A periodic chain of such Huygens' scatterers may effectively act as a so-called Huygens' metawaveguide with interesting new optical properties compared to non-resonant subwavelength grating waveguide counterparts. Inspiring by these recent findings, in our current research we are investigating more complex integrated photonic components, e.g., micro-ring resonators. In this talk, first I will explain the Forward Kerker effect of the resonant dielectric nanoantennas followed by the functionalities of a straight Huygens' metawaveguide. Next, I will demonstrate our high-Q Huygens' meta-ring-resonators and its different aspects. In conclusion, I will brief on the potential future applications of our demonstrated meta-ring-resonator in nonlinear and quantum integrated photonic systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".