Attention-based postprocessing of ensemble weather forecasts for renewable energy applications by leveraging inter-ensemble relationships of multiple predictors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indirect models for renewable energy forecasting rely heavily on accurate weather predictions. Operational weather forecasting today is mainly based on numerical weather prediction models, often employing ensembles to estimate the day-to-day forecast uncertainty. To correct for errors due to simplifications in these models, inaccurate initial conditions, and representativeness problems, statistical postprocessing becomes necessary for these ensemble forecasts. Current postprocessing techniques often disregard possible inter-ensemble relationships by correcting each member separately, or employ a distributional approach that requires extra multivariate methods to restore spatio-temporal and inter-variable correlations. In this work, we tackle these shortcomings with an innovative, attention-based member-by-member approach which postprocesses each member individually while simultaneously integrating information from other ensemble members. Variables required for renewable energy forecasting are postprocessed at the station level by regressing ensemble forecasts of multiple predictors, including the forecasted variable itself, against observational data. The training data utilized is sourced from the EUPPBench dataset, which contains ensemble predictions from the integrated forecasting system of the ECMWF and corresponding observations. Transformer modules built around Self-Attention are employed to capture dependencies between different predictors, such as temperature and total cloud cover, next to significant relationships between the ensemble members themselves. Additionally, our model postprocesses the forecasts for all lead times simultaneously, taking into account the correlation between the postprocessed variable and forecasts generated at earlier and later lead times. This results in postprocessing techniques that can be employed in downstream applications for conversion to renewable energy forecasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".