MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392578126 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-11249

The Adiabatic Heat Flux through the Top of the Core of Ancient Vesta from High-P,T Resistivity Experiments

2024· preprint· en· W4392578126 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Lenhart, Wenjun Yong, Secco Richard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdiabatic processElectrical resistivity and conductivityFlux (metallurgy)Core (optical fiber)Heat fluxHigh heatAstrophysicsAstrobiologyMaterials sciencePhysicsGeologyGeophysicsThermodynamicsHeat transferOpticsComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heat flow mechanisms in terrestrial planetary cores contribute to geophysical processes with broader significance such as the generation of a magnetic field. Thermal convective flow in a planetary core may be found with the combination of adiabatic heat flow estimates—which this study seeks to estimate—and thermal evolution models of total heat flow across the core-mantle boundary. Experimental data constraining the effects of light elements on these processes is still needed. In the case of asteroid Vesta, the core is expected to be composed of Fe alloyed with 13-16wt% S (Steenstra et al., 2019) and 1-2wt% Si (Pringle et al., 2013).To simulate the conditions of the early Vestan core, the resistivity of Fe alloyed with 16wt% S and 2wt% Si (Fe-16S-2Si) was measured at high pressures and into the liquid state. A 1000-ton cubic anvil press applied a static pressure of 2, 3, 4, or 5 GPa on the sample. The resistivity of Fe-16S-2Si was then calculated from the voltage drop and constant current across the sample at 300-2000 K along with post-experimental geometry measurements.With the electrical resistivity data, the thermal conductivity of Fe-16S-2Si is estimated using the Wiedemann-Franz Law. For 2-4 GPa, a thermal conductivity of 11+1.5 W/m/K is found. For the top of the core of ancient Vesta, an adiabatic heat flux of 0.3-0.4 mW/m2 is derived. These results indicate that the light elements expected in the Vestan core have a large effect on the thermodynamic properties, including more than halving the expected adiabatic heat flow. Since the total heat flux across the early Vestan core-mantle boundary has been previously estimated as >10 mW/m2 (Weiss et al., 2010), thermal convection alone may account for the magnetic dynamo in early Vesta with the presence of light alloying elements.References:Pringle, E.A., Savage, P.S., Badro, J., Barrat, J.-A., Moynier, F., 2013. Redox state during core formation on asteroid 4-Vesta, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 373, p. 75-82.Steenstra, E.S., Dankers, D., Berndt, J., Klemme, S., Matveev, S., van Westrenen, W., 2019. Significant depletion of volatile elements in the mantle of asteroid Vesta due to core formation, Icarus, v. 317, p. 669-681.Weiss, B.P., Gattacceca, J., Stanley, S., Rochette, P., Christensen, U.R., 2010. Paleomagnetic Records of Meteorites and Early Planetesimal Differentiation, Space Science Reviews, v. 152, p. 341-390.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207