MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392580310 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9312

Historical volcanic sulfur emissions and stratospheric sulfate aerosol optical properties for CMIP7

2024· preprint· en· W4392580310 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas J. Aubry, Anja Schmidt, Mahesh Kovilakam, Matthew Toohey, Michael Sigl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfate aerosolAerosolVolcanoSulfateSulfurEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesSulfur dioxideEarth scienceMeteorologyGeologyGeographyMaterials scienceChemistryGeochemistryInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Explosive volcanic eruptions injecting gases and aerosols into the stratosphere are a key natural driver of climate variability at annual to centennial timescales. They are thus one of the forcings considered by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) Climate Forcings Task Team, in charge of identifying and implementing the next generation forcings for current and future generations of Earth System models. This presentation will provide an overview of ongoing work to produce volcanic forcing datasets for phase 7 of CMIP (CMIP7).The datasets we produce will cover the period from 1750 to 2022 at version 1 to meet to the need of modelling groups who might run extended historical simulations starting in 1750 instead of 1850. We are producing one volcanic stratospheric sulfur emission dataset catering for the needs of models which have a prognostic interactive stratospheric aerosol scheme, as well as a stratospheric sulfate aerosol optical property dataset required by models that cannot interactively simulate stratospheric sufate aerosols. For the satellite era (from 1979 onwards), sulfur emissions and sufate aerosol optical properties are based on NASA’s MSVOLSO2L4 and GloSSAC datasets, respectively. For the pre-satellite era (1750-1978), the emission dataset is based on ice-core datasets complemented by the geological record, whereas the aerosol optical property dataset is directly derived from emissions using the latest version of the Easy Volcanic Aerosol (EVA) model. This ensures methodological consistency between our emission and optical property datasets, further enhanced by the fact that EVA is calibrated using the same datasets we use for the satellite era. Our choice of methods aims to maximize consistency with methodologies used in individual model intercomparison projects (e.g. PMIP and VolMIP). A major focus of our task team is to produce well-documented datasets, which includes extensive meta-data and flags, detailed documentation, and provision of open-access scripts used to create the datasets, which should facilitate future development and operationalization by the community. We also discuss the most critical challenges for providing accurate volcanic forcing datasets, including the under-recording of small-to-moderate magnitude eruptions before the satellite era, and the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai 2022 eruptions, which injected relatively small amounts of sulfur, but 150 Tg of water into the stratosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→