MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392580398 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-10371

Eggs and sausages: wireless instrumentation for measuring ice anisotropy and kinematics

2024· preprint· en· W4392580398 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lisa Craw, Michael Prior-Jones, Nicolas Rathmann, Jonathan Hawkins, Christine F. Dow, Elizabeth Bagshaw

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstrumentation (computer programming)AnisotropyKinematicsWirelessGeologyComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsOpticsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field observations of ice flow properties on large temporal and spatial scales are vital to improve our understanding of ice sheet and glacier dynamics. However, we are currently limited in what we can observe, and on what timescales, with wired instrumentation and remote sensing. We present preliminary tests of wireless instrumentation to measure the kinematics and anisotropy of flowing ice.We used a spherical probe ("cryoegg") emitting VHF radio waves to measure birefringence in 19 azimuthal directions around a borehole in the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream (NEGIS). From these data we are able to infer information about crystal anisotropy in the ice in three dimensions, and compare with a transfer matrix radio propagation model. This is a significant improvement on previous monostatic radar methods, which are limited to observations of crystal orientations in the horizontal plane.Additionally, we present initial observations of borehole tilt, temperature, pressure and conductivity from Donjek Glacier, Canada, collected using wireless borehole instruments ("cryowursts''). These data were transmitted through up to 170m of ice, and received at a solar-powered and satellite-enabled receiving station on the glacier surface. There is potential for these instruments to transmit data continuously from surging glaciers over multiple years.These preliminary studies demonstrate new possibilities for collecting exciting long-term datasets for glaciology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→