MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392582209 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-8689

Understanding Urban Tree Ecophysiology Worldwide: Unveiling the Urban Trees Ecophysiology Network (UTEN)

2024· preprint· en· W4392582209 on OpenAlexaff
Yakir Preisler, Meghan Blumstein, Maria Paula Cuervo, Xue Feng, Erez Feuer, Jessica Gersony, William M. Hammond, Grace P. John, Marylou Mantova, Yair Mau, Clara Nibbelink, Alessandro Ossola, Alain Paquette, Renee Prokopavicius-Marchin, Tim Rademacher, Kaisa Rissanen, Robert P. Skelton, Einat Shemesh‐Mayer, Jean V. Wilkening, Daniel M. Johnson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLeaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcophysiologyTree (set theory)EcologyBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the ongoing surge of urbanization, a majority of the world's population now resides in urban areas exposed to various environmental stressors. Cities, experiencing temperatures up to 10°C higher than nearby rural areas due to energy consumption and urban infrastructure, necessitate urgent measures to address these challenges, especially in the context of climate change and projected urban population growth. In this landscape, the amplification of tree canopy cover emerges as a potent instrument, with the potential to elevate the quality of urban life significantly. Trees, with their multifaceted benefits—including the reduction of energy consumption, reducing thermal stress and local temperatures via shading and transpiration, mitigation of air pollution, and the overall enhancement of well-being—stand as indispensable contributors. However, the resilience of urban trees is constantly tested by a wide range of abiotic and biotic stressors, accentuated by the formidable impacts of climate change, jeopardizing their functionality, productivity, and survival, reducing their cooling potential and other ecosystem services. Therefore, understanding the intricate relationship between urban environments and the ecophysiology of trees is crucial for addressing climate change, promoting urban forest health, and making informed decisions. To tackle that, the Urban Tree Ecophysiology Network (UTEN) has been established as a global collaboration platform involving researchers, stakeholders, and municipalities. UTEN aims to investigate two fundamental questions: how the urban environment affects tree functionality and health, and how trees modify the microclimate of cities at different biomes. Employing a comprehensive campaign-based approach, accompanied by high-resolution IoT sensors, we continuously measure trees' transpiration, growth, and diameter changes, as well as the surrounding temperature and relative humidity. Additionally, seasonal physiological measurements are employed to assess tree health and functionality. These shared and aggregated data empower researchers to address common questions related to tree health and stress in the face of a changing climate. Furthermore, network nodes can leverage the accumulated knowledge to explore site-specific inquiries tailored to their own urban realities. Through cultivating international collaboration and robust data sharing, UTEN is committed to optimizing the ecosystem services rendered by urban trees. This expansive network, currently encompassing 12 cities across multiple continents, is dedicated to deepening our comprehension of the intricate interplay between trees and the urban environment, thereby paving the way for a more resilient and sustainable urban future. In our presentation, we will share the preliminary outcomes gleaned from approximately one year of meticulous measurements, offering initial insights and preliminary conclusions drawn from these initial findings.  

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.119 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLeaf Properties and Growth MeasurementFrench-language works237,207