Elementos do Ensino por Investigação em atividades elaboradas por licenciandos em Química
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elements of Inquiry-based Teaching in activities elaborated by Chemistry undergraduates.Considering the importance of Inquiry-based Teaching (IT) in the educational process, the aim of this research was to analyze investigative elements in activities elaborated by Chemistry undergraduates from public Higher Education Institutions in Manaus, AM.Eleven undergraduate students participated in a workshop, and didactic materials produced by them were analyzed using the Diagnosis of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching Elements (DEEnCI) instrument and Discursive Textual Analysis.It was observed that the undergraduates understood the importance of IT.They highlighted that they had contact with such teaching strategy only in classes with a pedagogical profile, while classes with specific contents were taught entirely in a traditional manner.The most evident IT elements in the elaborated plans were the definition of the problem situation, the procedures, the data collection, and the student involvement during the activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it