Influence of strong directional sources in ambient seismic imaging using traffic-induced noise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Continuously moving seismic sources, such as vehicles and train cars, play a crucial role as passive sources for nondestructive exploration in urban areas. Seismic interferometry is commonly used in field data acquisition and processing using linear arrays. However, the simultaneous recording of high-energy noise, excited by buildings and factories, cannot be overlooked. We simulate moving-source seismic records with strong noises using orthogonal arrays. When strong noise originates from specific angles, the energy-phase velocity curves of arrays in different directions significantly diverge. We determine that an L-shaped array, formed by orthogonal arrays, can effectively mitigate this effect, yielding more consistent results. Nonetheless, spatial constraints often preclude the deployment of L-shaped arrays. To mitigate this issue, we develop a new parallel observation system. Field tests conducted on a main road validate that the new array is comparable with the L-shaped array in terms of dispersion extraction. Similar to synthetic data, the phase velocity extracted from the linear array field data is found to be unreliable. Drilling data align well with the inversion results of the parallel observation system. Given the challenges of urban traffic-induced signal acquisition, deploying multiazimuth arrays to minimize noise impact is essential. Considering the spatial limitations, the convenient parallel observation system emerges as a good choice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".