MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392587140 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2486

Simulated net biospheric carbon emissions of managed peatlands, and implications for net-zero and net-zero targets.

2024· preprint· en· W4392587140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alice Watts, Nigel T. Roulet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNet (polyhedron)PeatZero (linguistics)Environmental scienceZero emissionNet gainNet energyCarbon fibersAtmospheric sciencesNatural resource economicsHydrology (agriculture)PhysicsEconomicsMathematicsEcologyGeologyEngineeringWaste managementAnimal scienceBiologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peatlands have been disturbed throughout the Anthropocene. Peatland extraction and peat use results in a significant net emission of greenhouses gases over a relatively short time frame. However, not all carbon in extracted peat is lost to the atmosphere. To understand net-zero emissions, it is important to understand how emissions can be mitigated through management practices, and what offsets are required for irreducible emissions. Our research has the aims: (1) to develop an environmental systems model based on previous research, introduce land use change and management phases to the model runs, and consider the implications of the fate of peat; and (2) to ascertain net biospheric carbon emissions according to model phases and their variations.The model approximates peat mass and accumulation in an undisturbed peatland system, then simulates the removal by extraction of horticulture peat. The model replicates typical accumulation rates and measured emissions due to extraction. The environmental systems model has been coupled with a basic hydrological sub-model, and the model was evaluated by comparing simulated outputs to peat core 14C, C:N and FTIR field measurements from Riviere-du-Loup, Qc, Canada. We will present how management practices such as extraction duration, extraction intensity, and restoration delay impact simulated biospheric carbon emissions. Our simulations will also include the fate of extracted peat, demonstrating how peat use, storage and stabilised peat carbon impact net emissions. Based on our current restoration and extraction scenarios, we have deduced that it takes several thousand years to restore the biospheric carbon store of an extracted peatland. Preliminary work suggests that, depending on the assumed fate of the peat scenario, the biospheric restoration time can be reduced by 50-75% to recover carbon lost through peat extraction and use. Subsequently, offsets required for irreducible emissions to meet 2050 and 2100 targets can also be reduced.Our results will allow the Canadian peat industry to employ a backwards induction approach to meeting its net-zero targets by enabling us to infer when net-zero biospheric carbon emissions and carbon neutral conditions will be met without offset mechanisms and the duration with offset mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology→French-language works237,207→