MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392587152 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2473

Online databases of the geologic formations of Asia and Africa with display onto plate reconstructions

2024· preprint· en· W4392587152 on OpenAlexaff
James G. Ogg, Du Wen, Aditya Sivathanu, Sabrina Chang, Suyash Mishra, Sabin Zahirovic, Aaron Ault, O’Neil Mamallapalli, Haipeng Li, Mingcai Hou, Gabriele Ogg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDatabaseComputer graphics (images)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Building paleogeographic maps that are projected onto different tectonic plate reconstruction models requires team efforts to compile extensive interlinked databases of regional sedimentary and volcanic facies, data sharing standards, and computer projection methods. Two goals of the Deep-Time Digital Earth (DDE) program of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) Paleogeography Working Group are: (1) to interconnect online national databases for all geologic formations, and to compile these online "lexicons" for countries that currently lack these; (2) to project the combined paleogeographic output of these distributed databases for any time interval onto appropriate plate tectonic reconstructions.Therefore, we have worked with regional experts to compile and interlink cloud-based lexicons for different regions of the world that are enhanced by graphic user-interfaces. Online lexicons with map-based and stratigraphic-column navigation are currently completed for the Indian Plate (ca. 800 formations), China (ca. 3200), Vietnam-Thailand-Malaysia (ca. 600), and all major basins in Africa (ca. 700) and in the Middle East (ca. 700 formations). These will soon be joined by Japan (ca. 600 formations) and basins in South America (ca. 700 formations). A multi-database search system (age, region, lithology keywords, etc.) enables all returned entries be displayed by-age or in alphabetical order. The genera in the "fossil" field are auto-linked to their entries and images in the online Treatise of Invertebrate Paleontology. With a single click, a user can plot the original extent of the geologic formation (or an array of regional formations of a specified age) onto different plate reconstruction models with the polygon(s) filled with the appropriate lithologic facies pattern(s). Our team collaborated with the Macrostrat team at Univ. Wisconsin (Madison) to interlink with their extensive regional facies-time compilations for North America and the ocean basins to enable a near-global coverage. Following the lead of Macrostrat's ROCKD app, this project is in partnership with UNESCO's Commission for the Geologic Map of the World and other geological surveys to enable linking online geologic map units for direct access to the lexicon details on that geologic formation and its former paleogeographic setting. Essentially, goal is to create a view of the sediments and volcanics that were accumulating onto the Earth's surface at any time in the past.The main website (https://geolex.org) has links to the growing array of regional lexicons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.015
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207