MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392587682 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2666

Fine resolution classification of new ice, young ice, and first-year ice based on feature selection from Gaofen-3 quad-polarization SAR

2024· preprint· en· W4392587682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Haiyan Li, Kun Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyClimatologyFeature (linguistics)Sea iceRemote sensingPolarization (electrochemistry)Physical geographyGeographyChemistryLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea ice in the high latitude is an indicator of climate change and has undergone dramatic changes because of recent global warming. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a relatively practical tool for sea ice monitoring because of its low sensitivity to clouds, rain, and fog, as well as its capability for high-resolution earth observation in daylight or darkness. With the progression in SAR systems from single-pol to dual-pol, quad-pol and hybrid-pol, large numbers of parameters have been proposed for sea ice classification. Even though a large number of SAR characteristics have been used to classify sea ice, it remains unclear which parameters are the most effective for different regions and seasonal or environmental conditions. Meanwhile, classification studies for fine sea ice with high spatial resolution and many sub-types of sea ice, particularly in the case of rapidly changing first-year ice (FYI), which includes new ice (NI), young ice (YI), and FYI, are rather few. NI and YI have comparatively thinner thickness, and are often classified as FYI in these studies[1].A new method of sea ice classification based on feature selection from Gaofen-3 polarimetric SAR observations is proposed. The new approach classifies sea ice into four categories: open water, NI, YI, and FYI. Seventy parameters that have previously been applied to sea ice studies are re-examined for sea ice classification in the Okhotsk Sea near the melting point on 28 February 2020. The ‘separability index’ is used for the selection of optimal features for sea ice classification. Full polarization (σohh, SEi, Ks) and hybrid polarization parameters (σorl, CPSEi,ρrh-rv, αs) are determined as optimal. The selected parameters are used to classify NI, YI, and FYI using a SVM machine learning classifier; and classification results are validated by manually interpreted ice maps derived from Landsat-8 data. [1]Sea ice: types and forms - Canada.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→