MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392587993 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2003

Experimental transfer function of ground heat exchanger from thermal response tests using a deconvolution approach

2024· preprint· en· W4392587993 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriel Dion, Philippe Pasquier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat exchangerDeconvolutionThermalHeat transferFunction (biology)Transfer functionMaterials scienceComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMechanicsThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineeringAlgorithmElectrical engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ground-coupled heat pump systems exchange heat between a building and the surrounding ground. To simulate a ground heat exchanger (GHE), a transfer function is commonly used. This function represents the ground's capacity to exchange energy. Its use allows for the simulation of the ground's response to different heat load patterns. The heat transfer process is affected by key factors such as the ground's thermal properties and the groundwater flow. Accurate evaluation is critical for designing the GHE field to meet the thermal needs of a building for heating and cooling.The transfer function of the GHE represents its heat transfer over a time range from seconds to years of operation. The long-term component is usually defined by an analytical model, while the short-term component requires a more complex model to be evaluated. Indeed, analytical models do not accurately represent the transient heat transfer effects that occur in the borehole materials and heat transfer fluid. To avoid using thermal transfer models, the data from a thermal response test (TRT) can be used to retrieve an experimental transfer function. This study aims to outline the different applications of a deconvolution algorithm to retrieve a short-term transfer function from experimental TRT data.Applying a deconvolution algorithm to the outlet temperature signal of a TRT allows for estimation of the short-term response of the GHE without the need for a defined thermal model. The algorithm can iterate on the transfer function form, enabling accurate reconstruction of experimental temperature. One advantage of this method is that it only requires experimental data from a TRT to construct the transfer function.The methodology is applied to tests with constant and varying operating conditions, allowing to obtain one or more transfer functions depending on the number of operating conditions. Additionally, a deconvolution algorithm can be utilized to interpret distributed thermal response tests, helping in the identification of geological layers with the best thermal properties. This can assist system designers to reduce drilling costs for systems with multiple boreholes. Results present transfer functions that are smooth and close to ones obtained from a more advanced numerical model. Additionally, they can reconstruct experimental temperature precisely. It is worth noting that the transfer function curve is affected by groundwater flow, with larger flows resulting in a decrease in the curve for similar operating conditions.In conclusion, this research demonstrates the diverse applications of a deconvolution algorithm in interpreting a thermal response test across various geological settings, groundwater flow rates, operating conditions, and types of GHE. This leads to the estimation of a short-term transfer function, which can be used either to compute thermal parameters or validate various heating loads on the GHE through implementation in a simulation algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207