A New Negative Carbon Isotope Interval Caused by Manganese Redox Cycling After the Shuram Excursion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Several negative C isotope excursions (CIEs) occurred at the end of the Neoproterozoic era which have been generally attributed to the oxidation of organic carbon using sulfate as the terminal electron acceptor and the subsequent release of 13 C‐depleted dissolved inorganic C (DIC). Based on new analyses from the Doushantuo Formation in South China, we observe a negative C isotope excursion right after the well‐known Shuram excursion. This excursion is equivalent to the ∼550 Ma negative CIE which is globally expressed within several continental margins. However, the origins of this CIE in the termination of Ediacaran remain unresolved. Here, we hypothesize that this post‐Shuram negative CIE was caused by a localized manganese cycling that began with the oxidation of hydrothermal Mn(II) in a water column to insoluble Mn(IV)‐oxide, followed by accumulation of Mn(IV)‐oxide to the seafloor and its subsequent dissolution via Mn(IV) reduction leading to the release of dissolved Mn(II) and 13 C‐depleted DIC into ambient seawaters. This ultimately led to the precipitation of particulate Mn(II)‐carbonate characterized by low δ 13 C carb values ranging from −11.1‰ to −2.8‰. The presence of microbial fabrics in association with the Mn(II)‐carbonate further suggests that Mn(II)‐carbonate precipitation took place at the seafloor in shallow sun‐lit waters rather than in the deeper sediment pile, which archived ambient seawater C isotopic signal. Although most Ediacaran negative CIEs were generally attributed to sulfate reduction, our findings suggest that at a local level, Mn cycling can also lead to negative CIE in the Neoproterozoic, and potentially at other times in Earth's history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".