MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392593886 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3976407/v1

Contribution of ice dynamics along Nares Strait to the stability of ice arches

2024· preprint· en· W4392593886 on OpenAlexafffund
G. W. K. Moore, Stephen Howell, Thomas J. Ballinger, Kaitlin McNeil, Mike Brady

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsGeologyArchSea iceDynamics (music)Stability (learning theory)OceanographyEngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nares Strait, situated between northwest Greenland and Ellesmere Island, is an important conduit for exporting sea ice from the Arctic, especially thick multi-year ice undergoing an accelerated loss compared to other ice types. This export is impacted by ice arches that can form along the Strait and remain stable for months at a time resulting in a reduction in ice export. Arch stability is a function of sea ice thickness and there is a concern that the thinning of Arctic sea ice may weaken the arches resulting in an accelerated export of sea ice. However, little is known about the spatial and temporal variability of sea ice thickness along the Strait. Here we show that before arch formation, there is a local maximum in ice thickness where arches typically form, which is related to ice convergence. Furthermore, we demonstrate that ice motion continues north of the arch after it forms, resulting in convergence and a dynamic thickening of the sea ice. We propose that, even though thinning ice is a cause for concern, the dynamics of sea ice transport along Nares Strait lead to localized thickening of sea ice that may contribute to continued arch formation and stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→