MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392596670 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-349

Breaking Internal Waves and Ocean Diapycnal Diffusivity in a High-Resolution Regional Ocean Model: Evidence of a Wave-turbulence Cascade

2024· preprint· en· W4392596670 on OpenAlexaff
Kayhan Momeni, Yuchen Ma, W. R. Peltier, Dimitris Menemenlis, Ritabrata Thakur, Yulin Pan, Brian K. Arbic, Joseph Skitka, Matthew H. Alford

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCascadeTurbulenceBreaking waveInternal waveGeologyEnergy cascadeThermal diffusivityWind waveOceanographyEnvironmental scienceMechanicsMeteorologyClimatologyPhysicsWave propagationOpticsEngineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While the primary origin of ocean diapycnal diffusivity is commonly attributed to stratified turbulence induced by breaking internal waves (IWs), verifying diffusivity values in ocean circulation models within specific geographical regions remains challenging due to limited microstructure measurements. Recent analyses of a downscaled global ocean simulation into higher-resolution regional setups northeast of Hawaii, reveal a notably enhanced fit between simulated IW spectra and in-situ profiler measurements like the Garrett-Munk spectrum [Nelson et al. (2020), Pan et al. (2020), Thakur et al. (2022)]. In this study, we utilize this dynamically downscaled ocean simulation to scrutinize the dynamics of IW-breaking and the wave-turbulence cascade in this region explicitly. Employing a modified version of the Kappa Profile Parameterization (KPP), we infer the horizontally-averaged vertical profile of diapycnal diffusivity. Comparing this inferred profile to the background profile used in low-resolution coupled climate models—such as the Community Earth System Model (CESM) by the US National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)—is a central aspect of our investigation. Our exploration reveals that the wavefield in the high-resolution regional domain is dominated by a well-resolved spectrum of low-mode IWs, predictable through appropriate eigenvalue computations for stratified flow. Finally, we propose a novel tentative approach to enhance the KPP parameterization. This approach holds promise for refining our understanding of diapycnal diffusivity, offering valuable insights for improving ocean circulation models. References: AD Nelson, BK Arbic, D Menemenlis, WR Peltier, MH Alford, N Grisouard, and JM Klymak. Improved internal wave spectral continuum in a regional ocean model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 125(5):e2019JC015974, 2020. Yulin Pan, Brian K Arbic, Arin D Nelson, Dimitris Menemenlis, WR Peltier, Wentao Xu, and Ye Li. Numerical investigation of mechanisms underlying oceanic internal gravity wave power-law spectra. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 50(9):2713–2733, 2020. Ritabrata Thakur, Brian K Arbic, Dimitris Menemenlis, Kayhan Momeni, Yulin Pan, W Richard Peltier, Joseph Skitka, Matthew H Alford, and Yuchen Ma. Impact of vertical mixing parameterizations on internal gravity wave spectra in regional ocean models. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(16): e2022GL099614, 2022.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→