MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392598472 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-3305

ENIGMA: East-Asian Network Initiative for Gravity Measurement Alliance: A Proposal and Science Cases

2024· preprint· en· W4392598472 on OpenAlexaff
Edwin J. Son, Jeong Woo Kim, J. J. Oh, Hwansun Kim, Cheinway Hwang, Ching‐Chung Cheng, Yoshihiro Ito, Yoshiyuki Tanaka, Wen-Bin Shen, Wei Luan, Minzhang Hu, Ziwei Liu, Heping Sun, Xiaodong Chen, Sangwook Bae, Heejun Yoon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllianceEast AsiaPolitical scienceRegional scienceGeographyChinaLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose the establishment of an observational network comprising micro gravitometers across East Asia including, but not limited to Republic of Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the Chinese mainland. The network will generate a parallel observation belt within the seismogenic zone that connects the Japan Trench, Ryuku Trenches, and Nankai Through, both constituent components of the Ring of Fire, for the detection of slight changes in micro-gravity for analyzing earthquakes of different magnitudes with different sources and depths. We will establish a data hub for sharing data, managing combined data format, and distributing computing resources for conducting collaborative research. In addition, the network measurement of micro-gravity can be used for searching the dark matter candidate inside Earth. The presentation demonstrates various science cases that could be undertaken by implementing a network of GWR Instruments Inc.’s superconducting gravimeters and a data hub within the East Asian region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207